Custom Operational Systems for Australian Mortgage Brokers
MORTGAGE BROKERS

Your CRM settles loans. It doesn't chase them.

If you're running BrokerEngine, Salestrekker, or anything similar, you'll know the pattern: validation errors, document chasing, the same client details typed into four different places, and the gap between what the software estimates and what the lender actually approves. All of it still lands on you or your back-office team.

ChadScales builds custom infrastructure that sits underneath the CRM you already run, closing the specific gaps that cost a brokerage real hours every week.

The documents you built yourself

Most brokers writing real volume stopped using the fact find inside their aggregator years ago and built their own in Excel. Every independent tool sold into this market asks them to give that up, which is exactly why the spreadsheets are still there and still being filled in at nine at night.

We don't replace them. Your fact find and your funds to complete come out filled, in your format, with your letterhead, off a single entry. Anything the reading wasn't sure of is flagged for you. You check those and sign, because you're still responsible for the file. You've just stopped being the one typing it.

Built around your own patterns

Some of the biggest gaps aren't software bugs, they're patterns nobody's watching. We build systems that learn from how your own files and clients actually behave, then act on it without anyone having to remember.

Stip prediction

A system that learns which loan types or lenders tend to generate stips for your specific deal mix, and flags the file early, before the stip even lands.

Follow-up timing

A system that learns when a client is actually likely to respond, and times the next follow-up around that instead of a fixed schedule.

What your CRM handles vs what's still manual

This is the pattern we see across most aggregator CRMs, BrokerEngine and Salestrekker included.

What the CRM handles

Pipeline staging and document collection through the loan lifecycle
Borrowing estimates and credit guide generation

What's still manual

Tracking down exactly what's missing when something errors out
Manually checking estimates and documents before they can move forward
Producing your own fact find and funds to complete in your own format

On BrokerEngine, that often means expanding folder after folder to find a flagged Credit Proposal error, or clearing your cache when Suite360 can't locate a Loan Writer ID or IDR detail. On Salestrekker, it can mean re-running the lender's own calculator by hand once your Maximum Borrowing estimate drifts more than 5% from what they'll actually approve, or chasing FinanceVault uploads that never update their own status. Different platform, same kind of gap.

What we could build

Validation

A check that catches a missing field before you ever see an error screen, not after.

Lender accuracy

A flag that fires the moment a borrowing estimate drifts too far from what a lender will actually approve.

Document tracking

Status that updates itself the second a file lands, instead of waiting on someone to check it.

Post-settlement

Reviews, refinance checks and trail protection that run on their own, without anyone opening a spreadsheet.

What the audit delivers

01

System topology map

Exactly how your current tools connect, and where they don't.

02

Leakage figure

A real annual dollar figure for what the manual gaps are costing.

03

Build blueprint

What we'd actually build to close the gap, specific to your setup.

04

Fixed-scope proposal

One price, agreed before anything gets built.

What it costs to find out

There are three steps and the first two currently cost nothing. The diagnostic call is short and exists to work out whether an audit is worth doing at all. The Operational Mapping Audit itself is currently run at no charge for brokerages that look like a fit, and it produces the annual leakage figure plus a fixed-scope proposal. Builds typically start from $2,500 and are priced against what the audit found, never by the hour.

Not every enquiry gets an audit. Intake is capped, and the call is where that gets decided. If an off-the-shelf tool already solves your problem, that's what you'll be told on the call.

Who we work best with

01
Brokerages writing 8 or more files a month
Where the per-file admin has started compounding into real weeks, not minutes.
02
Brokers who built their own documents and won't give them up
If you're happy with the fact find inside your aggregator, you're not who this is for.
03
Whatever software you're running
Whether that's BrokerEngine, Salestrekker, or something else entirely, we build around what you've already got, not a replacement for it.
04
A real operational bottleneck, not just curiosity
The audit exists to find a specific, costed problem worth fixing.

Who this isn't for

The average active Australian broker lodges around 3.2 applications a month. At that volume, taking forty minutes off a file gives you about two hours back a month, and two hours a month does not justify building anything. If that's you, keep your spreadsheet, it's doing its job.

You're happy using the fact find built into your aggregator. Then use it, it's free and it's maintained for you.
What you actually want is a CRM. This isn't that, and there are good products that are.
You want lead generation or marketing. That's a different problem and a different provider.

Questions we get

If your team is manually chasing documents across multiple loans, re-checking borrowing estimates by hand, retyping the same client details into three or four places per file, or losing track of where a file sits without opening several systems at once, that's the kind of drag worth fixing. The audit exists to find that gap and put a real number on it.
The first two steps cost nothing. The diagnostic call is short and decides whether an audit is worth doing, and the Operational Mapping Audit itself is currently run at no charge for brokerages that look like a fit. Builds typically start from $2,500 and are priced against the annual value the audit identifies, not against a generic industry quote. See how pricing works.
No. Custom systems get built around the CRM you already run, not as a replacement for it. Switching platforms doesn't fix a process gap, it just moves it somewhere new.
Yes, and the point is that it comes out in your own template rather than someone else's. Every independent tool sold to Australian brokers replaces the broker's document with the tool's document, which is the same reason most brokers who built their own spreadsheets ignore the fact find inside their aggregator. What comes out is a draft for review. You check every field, make every assessment call, and sign, so nothing changes about Best Interests Duty or the seven year record-keeping obligation under the NCCP.
Usually not. The average active Australian broker lodges around 3.2 applications a month, and at that volume taking forty minutes off a file returns about two hours a month, which doesn't justify building anything. This is worth doing at roughly eight files a month or more, where the per-file hours compound into real weeks.
This happens when BrokerEngine's Suite360 integration can't find your Loan Writer ID or your IDR (Internal Dispute Resolution) details in Suite360/FLEX. Clear your browser cache and try again. If that doesn't fix it, you'll need to contact BrokerEngine support directly, there's no self-service fix for this specific error.
BrokerEngine flags problems in the Credit Proposal section with an orange marker, but it doesn't tell you what's wrong at a glance. You have to expand each folder one at a time, read the specific error statement inside, and fix it there before the checkmark turns green and you can generate the report.
It's not meant to match exactly. Salestrekker's own target is a variance of less than 5% from the actual lender calculator. If your numbers come back more than 5% apart, that's a sign to run the real lender calculator manually rather than rely on the estimate for that deal.
Document status updates in FinanceVault are manual by design. Someone on your team has to actually open and check each file for completeness and accuracy before it can be marked reviewed, there's no automatic pass or fail the moment a client uploads something.

Find your number.

Get a free diagnostic
Scroll to Top